← Search

Pamela Owens

— year-end
19 matches · 12W–7L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Pamela Owens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Lewis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
Susan Lee / Doug Ng
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Chin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Lynch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with ALEX S WHANG mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Olga Keselman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tisha Kermoian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-24 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fedwa Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Belton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynne Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-0
L
2026-03-08 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tegan Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.5% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.5% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
47%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova