← Search

Jenn Nickell

Fairfield, CT
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 24W–28L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jenn Nickell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-09-12 · MIT:Smashed:Montanaro/Milano · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Nickell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-18 · MIT:Smashed:Milano/Montanaro · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Nickell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-13 · MIT:Smashed:Milano/Montanaro · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zachary Chapman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-11-16 · MIT:Smashed:Milano/Montanaro · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Nickell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-01-19 · MIT:Make it a Double:Milano/Marsden · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Nickell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
Barbara Hutchins / Peter Toolan
2023-12-01 · MIT:Make it a Double:Milano/Marsden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Nierman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-06 · MIT:Make it a Double:Milano/Marsden · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Nickell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-02-26 · MIT:Milford Magnolias:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Montanaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-02-12 · MIT:Serve Us a Double:Milano/Mardsen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Nierman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2023-01-22 · MIT:Serve Us a Double:Milano/Mardsen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geoff Stowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-15 · MIT:Serve Us a Double:Milano/Mardsen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Skylar Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2022-12-18 · MIT:Milford Magnolias:Nava/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chihwa Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 48.5% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams