← Search

Russell Ridings

Broomfield, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 89W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Russell Ridings to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-08-26 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Wendt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · CVTA BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendi Rea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Funderburke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · CVTA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amelia Taljaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-02 · CVTA BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Fields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · SS-LGT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Talia Cioth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · CVTA BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendi Rea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · SS-LGT NAVY · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Talia Cioth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Wendt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · CVTA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meredith Rafter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · SS-LGT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristi Savignano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 59.8% of games
4.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.4% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
56.4%
22W–17L · 52.2% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams