← Search

Troy Peacock

— year-end
101 matches · 50W–51L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Troy Peacock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
Gary Volino / Tim Klespies
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arjuna Chala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Mark Karwisch / Michael Cammack
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raghesh Nair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Mike Mies / Jerry Richman
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Kauffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
James Wilson / Chuck Patel
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-03 · Lifetime (Joan Lee)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bethany Powell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-20 · Lifetime (Joan Lee)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Berenice Guerrero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · Jones Bridge (John Bowers)* · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-21 · Jones Bridge (Nathan Neeley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-13 · Jones Bridge (John Bowers)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · Jones Bridge (Nathan Neeley)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arjuna Chala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-15 · Jones Bridge (Nathan Neeley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.8%
43W–34L · 51.9% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 43.3% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King