← Search

Gregory Fage

Harrison, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 17W–42L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Gregory Fage to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-03-29 · NRRC: Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Schwarcz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · NRRC: Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Fang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-07-17 · WTC: 3.0 40+ Deep Impact · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Cantone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-01 · WTC: 3.0 18+ Big Dipper · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Ercolano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-10 · WTC: 3.0 18+ Big Dipper · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Hopemark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-05-27 · WTC: 3.0 18+ Big Dipper · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-15 · WTC: 3.0 40+ Deep Impact · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-27 · WTC: NY: 3.0 SS 40+ Masters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amit Bhattacharyya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-20 · WTC: NY: 3.0 SS 40+ Masters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Viscelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-05-30 · WTC: NY: 3.0 SS 40+ Masters · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angelo Cocciolillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
N/A
2022-03-05 · Maximum Tennis Development Zone (MTDZ) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tania Telleria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Giordano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.9% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
6.2%
1W–15L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams