← Search

Erica Whiteway

Fort Worth, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 47W–28L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Erica Whiteway to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-12 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-09-11 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Melissa McDaniel / Meagan York
2026-06-13 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassi Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassi Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-24 · Findley · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tamara Murer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · Findley · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tamara Murer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
L
2026-05-23 · Findley · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Reaves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-23 · Findley · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tamara Murer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-22 · Findley · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Reaves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Sparling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-27 · RTC CURTIS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lily Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 58% of games
4.0
63.9%
39W–22L · 55.1% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe