← Search

Angela Bleak

Lehi, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
391 matches · 219W–172L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angela Bleak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history391 matches
L
2026-08-14 · Full Metal Racquets · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicholas Mihalyi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Trisha Cutrer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Full Metal Racquets · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with JJ Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kat Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tricia Sederberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Kelley Epstein / Jennifer Johnson
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mithona Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · Full Metal Racquets · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with JJ Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kat Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams97 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 63.2% of games
3.0
60%
24W–16L · 57.1% of games
3.5
60.2%
56W–37L · 52.9% of games
4.0
51.6%
65W–61L · 49.3% of games
4.5
24%
6W–19L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 68.1% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.5% of games
7.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 51.6% of games
8.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
81 matches
#1 Singles
17%
67 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova