← Search

Janet Winch

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 55W–58L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Janet Winch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-08-05 · LCTA40/Winch-Hoffman/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Andrea Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · LCTA40/Winch-Hoffman/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Andrea Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · LCTA55/Adler/MPR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sylvia Delsalto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · LCTA55/Adler/MPR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sylvia Delsalto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Durst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · LCTA (A) 4.0-3.0W 55 & Over (Barkley) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leila Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-2
W
2026-06-08 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Durst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-04 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shane Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aimee Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Cecil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aimee Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-20 · LCTA55/Smith/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leila Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50.6%
39W–38L · 51% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games
6.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.2% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe