← Search

Jamie Schroeder

EDMONDS, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 37W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jamie Schroeder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-08-06 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-30 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-09 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · KC & Jamie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-24 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · AYTC-Ballers-Pollock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-21 · #1 Mixed Doubles · with Scott Marcus championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6
W
2026-03-07 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
2026-02-07 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 52.6% of games
3.5mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 60.9% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 39.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Female Singles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova