← Search

Katie Jurgenson

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 85W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katie Jurgenson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-08-09 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · Colasurdo/Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebe Colasurdo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · Colasurdo/Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebe Colasurdo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Colasurdo/Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebe Colasurdo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · Colasurdo/Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebe Colasurdo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · Colasurdo/Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebe Colasurdo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeri Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Holowetzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · Colasurdo/Jurgenson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebe Colasurdo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 62.9% of games
3.5
67.7%
42W–20L · 59% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 39.9% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 39.1% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
52 matches
#2 Singles
14%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe