← Search

PETER GOODMAN

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 40W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add PETER GOODMAN to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-05-30 · MI-Parcel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Chatalas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · MI-Parcel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Cahoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-10 · MI-Parcel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-18 · MI-Parcel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Ribeiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-22 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-05 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Olivia Shone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-26 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeannie Pae mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-07-13 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeannie Pae mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-06-29 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-13 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-01 · MI-Parcel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Pomering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-10 · MI-Parcel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Ribeiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
24W–24L · 53.1% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 49.4% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams