← Search

Margie Davis

— year-end
327 matches · 224W–103L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Margie Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history327 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · FredCha8.5MX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ricardo Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
Michelle Cameron / Daniel Park
2026-08-16 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ricardo Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ricardo Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · mccullough - Tri- Bounce-tastic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Pietryka Burley - 4.5 PB ladies · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Sine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · mccullough - Tri- Bounce-tastic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jin Lei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Karen Beling / Cathy Shields
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Maureen Kolb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Maureen Kolb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Maureen Kolb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Maureen Kolb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Pietryka Burley - 4.5 PB ladies · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vicki Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams107 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
80%
12W–3L · 64.6% of games
4.5
72.3%
102W–39L · 59.5% of games
8.5
79.2%
38W–10L · 62.2% of games
0.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
77.8%
21W–6L · 58.1% of games
8.5mixed
40%
10W–15L · 47.9% of games
9.0mixed
58.3%
21W–15L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
150 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
63 matches
#1 Singles
5%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer