← Search

Nicole Kipp

— year-end
166 matches · 113W–53L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Nicole Kipp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Buckhorn Fireballs/Kipp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Dunleavy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Dunleavy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · Buckhorn Fireballs Tri-Level/Guido · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Buckhorn Fireballs Tri-Level/Guido · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissy Heybroek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · Buckhorn / N. Kipp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissy Heybroek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Buckhorn / N. Kipp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-30 · Buckhorn / N. Kipp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Warmbier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · Buckhorn / N. Kipp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheryl Schumacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Buckhorn / N. Kipp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-09 · Buckhorn / N. Kipp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissy Heybroek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-12 · Buckhorn Fireballs - N. Kipp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Wingard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.9%
97W–48L · 58.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams