← Search

Dana Cervenka

Atlanta, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 20W–39L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Dana Cervenka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-06-22 · Vermack (Jennifer Browne-Payne)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Browne-Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Etzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-08 · Dekalb TC (Paddi White)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Debra Kocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-11 · Dekalb TC (Gigi Conner)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Kocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-12-04 · Dekalb TC (Paddi White)* · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amber York
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-11-20 · Dekalb TC (Paddi White)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amber York
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-13 · Dekalb TC (Paddi White)* · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-16 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amber York
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-01-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 48.3% of games
4.5
31.6%
12W–26L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe