← Search

Andrew Biegacki

WADSWORTH, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 33W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Andrew Biegacki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 2 CC Benny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gurucharan Ganapathi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · A18 4.0M 2 CC Benny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gurucharan Ganapathi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · A18 4.0M 2 CC Benny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Spencer Selman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-15 · C 7.5M CC Ganim · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Evan Kuczynski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-26 · C 7.5M CC Ganim · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Levy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-18 · C 7.5M CC Ganim · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with JOSEPH BENNY
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · C 7.5M CC Ganim · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JOSEPH BENNY
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
Ryan Hannan / Dan Johnson
2025-05-19 · A18 4.0M 4 CC Benny · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with JOSEPH BENNY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-12 · A18 4.0M 4 CC Benny · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Cerveny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
William Scott / Paritosh Juyal
2025-04-05 · A18 3.5M CC Ganim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Kuczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-02-22 · A18 3.5M CC Ganim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Kuczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-02-08 · A18 3.5M CC Ganim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Lustre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 62% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.2% of games
6.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 50.9% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.5% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.6% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 70% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 74% of the time
#1 Doubles
74%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer