← Search

Erin Ince

Ridgefield, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 25W–7L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Erin Ince to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2025-09-14 · VTC-Damiano/Simpson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bart Rijmenams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · with ROSY ALANIS championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Joann Szueber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-07-27 · N OR-Heredia · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Damiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2025-07-14 · Palena/Blunt-The Volley Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-13 · N OR-Heredia · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-01 · N OR-Heredia · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Szueber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-30 · Palena/Blunt-The Volley Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-14 · CGM-Heredia/Palena · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-01 · CGM-Heredia/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Damiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-05-10 · CGM-Heredia/Palena · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-05-04 · CGM-Heredia/Palena · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delena Palena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 64.4% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 75% of the time
#1 Doubles
75%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams