← Search

Amy Erwin

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 56W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amy Erwin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-08-24 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindy Gignac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · WSolomon (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Mermans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Wendy Solomon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rosie Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Solomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Jarman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · WSolomon (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzannah Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · WSolomon (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Whitney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · WSolomon (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brook Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Laura Clancy / Lauren Mulcahy
2025-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Suzannah Hicks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6
W
Lisa Stewart / Mitchell Kelling
2025-07-16 · LGignac/Sevigny (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindy Gignac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-14 · SHicks/JSmith (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Avin Dwivedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.2%
27W–12L · 56.1% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.8% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.4% of games
7.5
75%
12W–4L · 57.3% of games
8.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 45.8% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer