← Search

David Gremaud

Overland, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 52W–40L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add David Gremaud to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Yoder (F) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · Yoder (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · Yoder (S) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · Yoder (S) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-4
L
2026-03-29 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
William Kelly / Andre Rog
2026-03-22 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raju Vanka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-02-07 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Lohr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sambit Mohanty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
62.5%
45W–27L · 54.5% of games
4.0
35%
7W–13L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
36 matches
#2 Singles
25%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams