← Search

Leticia Monge

— year-end
120 matches · 53W–67L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Leticia Monge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Ford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-24 · Orange-Pelliccia · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-13 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Alpert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-09 · Sanlando-Crane · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-06 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ella Simsek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ella Simsek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-23 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ella Simsek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · Sanlando-Crane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dorothy Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-30 · Sanlando-Pelliccia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Alpert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · Sanlando-Crane · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvia Landgraf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams75 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 54% of games
3.5
29%
9W–22L · 43.4% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.8% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 42.9% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.6% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer