← Search

Chad Wolff

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Chad Wolff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-06 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with SIMON MIRANOWICZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bill James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · MAC Mid-court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · MAC Yost · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · MAC Yost · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · MAC Yost · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · 26 MAC Machine - Jepson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasey Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-01-10 · 26 MAC Machine - Jepson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasey Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-23 · MAC Church · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Gault mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-10 · MAC Church · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with CONSTANCE MATTOX mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.6% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer