← Search

Ken Weitzman

— year-end
33 matches · 29W–4L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ken Weitzman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-03-20 · LIHR, Kronenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Singer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-10 · Made to Move, Kotov · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Kotov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-12-14 · Made to Move, Kotov · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Cullington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-11-09 · Made to Move, Kotov · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Uzo Aneke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-09-14 · #2 Doubles · with Heath Berger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with Heath Berger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-08-26 · #1 Doubles · with Heath Berger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-08-12 · LI Health & Racquet, Marklin/Monticciolo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Nickeson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-05 · LI: LI Health & Racquet, Kronenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Craddock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-07-15 · LI Health & Racquet, Marklin/Monticciolo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Sparacio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-09 · LI Health & Racquet, Marklin/Monticciolo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Sparacio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-08 · LI: LI Health & Racquet, Kronenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Craddock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 64.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 76% of the time
#1 Doubles
76%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams