← Search

Traci Huber

BILLINGS, MT
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 87W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Traci Huber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-07-26 · 406 Love · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Bach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · 406 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Poetzl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Jackson Fischer / Kala Riester
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Nicholas Scott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Benjamin Schlichting / Stephanie Skarwecki
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Navin Marimuthu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Navin Marimuthu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Stephen Slubar / Jaclyn Bermudez
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Navin Marimuthu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Elin Farnell / Wil Buchanan
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Nicholas Scott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-28 · 406 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Navin Marimuthu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-28 · 406 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nicholas Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-02-27 · 406 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nicholas Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-04 · #2 Doubles · with Rich Farrell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.6% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.7% of games
4.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 57.4% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 58.2% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
7 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal