Dimitrina Schoyer
Mount Prospect, IL
475 matches · 286W–189L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Dimitrina Schoyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history475 matches
L
Julia Visser / Teresa Konyndyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Jessica Rush / Alison Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams118 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E M40.7.0 6.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $29
NITA E 35W40h Wilmette- Lam
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 3Cent Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 4Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E M40&O7.0 1RT Schoyer Sat 7 $27
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 5.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $27
CDTA S M40&O7.0 2.RT Schoyer Sat 5 $27
CDTA S M40&O8.0 3.RT Lam-2 Sat 5 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 9.RT Lam Mon 7 $27
CDTA S TriWMid 6.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA W M18&O7.0 2.Tam Leonardo Sat 7 $22
CDTA W M40&O7.0 3.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $27
NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA E 40W40c River Trails-Lund/Lam
NITA S 35W18b River Trails-Lam
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
NITA W 35W18d River Trails-Lam
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
61%
25W–16L · 52.8% of games
3.5
61.6%
109W–68L · 55% of games
4.0
56%
14W–11L · 52.9% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 55.9% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.3%
55W–20L · 58.7% of games
7.5mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 51.7% of games
8.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 54.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
192 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
142 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
136 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.