← Search

Rina Dyer

— year-end
58 matches · 42W–16L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Rina Dyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Westwood Seredni · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Westwood Seredni · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Westwood Seredni · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emma Moredock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · Westwood Zach · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · Westwood Walek · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Holder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · Westwood Walek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annmarie Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-11 · Westwood Walek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annmarie Hutchison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Westwood Boss Babes - Seredni · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Murtaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Bearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with SanDee Gammon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · Westwood Boss Babes - Seredni · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Mulholland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with SanDee Gammon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
80%
20W–5L · 66.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.9% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.2% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.2% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova