← Search

Teck Wong

— year-end
165 matches · 100W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teck Wong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Jersey Perfectly Matched · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Soumitro Chakraborty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Sison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Sison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Bryant Jarocki / David Greenberg
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Aaron Daubert-Terrigno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Mark Pollack / Sanjay Jain
2026-08-08 · NJD/Jersey Slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Indranil Das
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · NJD/Jersey Slammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harold Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Justin Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · SPRING CENTRAL 2/PTP Mavericks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allen Moy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · SPRING CENTRAL 2/PTP Mavericks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Prasanna Kusalakumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · SPRING CENTRAL 2/PTP Mavericks · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · NJ: Jersey Strikers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Obaid Farghani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · SPRING CENTRAL 2/PTP Mavericks · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.3%
92W–58L · 53.5% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.7% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
24 matches
#1 Singles
12%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert