← Search

Megan Maurer

— year-end
200 matches · 104W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Megan Maurer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Zuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanthi Sivendran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fernanda Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fernanda Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Bent Creek Racquettes - Borza · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Lancaster CC Court Crushers - Mallon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Binford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.8%
31W–11L · 61.9% of games
3.5
48.3%
29W–31L · 48.6% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 70.1% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 46% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 43.8% of games
6.0mixed
40.9%
18W–26L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
12W–16L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
47 matches
#1 Singles
10%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer