← Search

Mary Ann Larson

— year-end
187 matches · 83W–104L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Mary Ann Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Foxy Dawgs · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-13 · Donadoni - Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · Donadoni - Serves You Right · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darla Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · Donadoni - Serves You Right · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · Donadoni - Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Valdes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · Ida Lee - Brill - Spring Shenanigans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Moira Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · Brill - Tennisanity · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Coni Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-01 · Brill - Tennisanity · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-08 · Brill - Tennisanity · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · Ida Lee - Brill - Spring Shenanigans · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · Ida Lee - Brill - Spring Shenanigans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-15 · Ida Lee - Brill - Spring Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Egenrieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams70 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.6% of games
4.0
42%
58W–80L · 48.9% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 38% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.8% of games
7.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert