← Search

Birgit Sorgenfrei

Northville, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 143W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Birgit Sorgenfrei to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
W
2026-07-31 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zack Ismail mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zack Ismail mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · SCWB-Chen 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-06 · SCWB- Ramon 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carly Plescia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Toggweiler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · SCWB-Chen 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carly Plescia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · SCWB- Ramon 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-17 · SCWB-Chen 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · FAC-Diamond 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carly Plescia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51.8%
29W–27L · 52.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 51% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 53.8% of games
7.0
55.1%
27W–22L · 53% of games
7.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
80.7%
46W–11L · 64.9% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
43 matches
#2 Singles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
14%
32 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert