← Search

Andrew Finlay

Herriman, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 107W–116L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Finlay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
L
David Blake / Dali Licul
2026-08-11 · #4 Doubles · with Tom Pinborough championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Sports Mall Blue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · Sports Mall Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Pinborough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Sports Mall Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karthik Kasiviswanathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Koji Sato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Pinborough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Claudine Finlay championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Heather Evans / Tyler Findlay
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Britany Egan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · SM- Finlay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudine Finlay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
W
2026-05-26 · Sports Mall Blue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darin Johncock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · Sports Mall Blue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · SM- Finlay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudine Finlay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
47.9%
58W–63L · 49.5% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 58% of games
6.5mixed
100%
9W–0L · 63.9% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
20W–24L · 49.4% of games
7.5mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
97 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
5 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova