← Search

Carol Peebles

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 138W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Peebles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jill Shanda championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Doubles Trouble Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Stormans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Doubles Trouble Summer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chun Saul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · Dizon-Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Dizon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-19 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-10 · Dizon-Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chun Saul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · Dizon-Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Dizon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-04 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
61.3%
92W–58L · 53.4% of games
4.0
40%
14W–21L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
92 matches
#1 Singles
29%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
28 matches
#2 Singles
10%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert