← Search

Curtis Sampson

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 161W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Curtis Sampson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-10 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-15 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · Liberty Park-Bublik/Totland · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-05-26 · Liberty Park-Bublik/Totland · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · Liberty Park-Bublik/Totland · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · Eccles- CJS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gretel Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · Liberty Park-Bublik/Totland · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · Eccles- CJS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gretel Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-13 · Liberty Park-Bublik/Totland · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Bublik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-10 · Eccles- CJS · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gretel Sampson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · Bublik · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.7% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.2% of games
4.0
78.2%
68W–19L · 58.6% of games
4.5
50%
24W–24L · 54.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.5% of games
7.5mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
58 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal