← Search

Jill Carnahan

Fort Mill, SC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
275 matches · 137W–138L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Carnahan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history275 matches
L
2026-09-14 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-28 · KCrane (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Mullis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · MCTA55/Pope/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lizette Conover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-14 · KCrane (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandy Mullis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann Lacarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · MCTA55/Pope/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-07-21 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Monty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Cooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Estil Strawn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Saeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-10 · MCTA40/Ruggerio/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Saeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
51.7%
30W–28L · 52.4% of games
3.5
48.6%
34W–36L · 48.4% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.4% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
6.5
52.8%
38W–34L · 53.7% of games
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 39.1% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.5% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
71 matches
#3 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe