← Search

Jill Bradshaw

Madison, WI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 125W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Bradshaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
L
2026-09-10 · WI Combo 6.5W MALT Bradshaw · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Ibarra
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · WI Combo 6.5W MALT Bradshaw · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Ibarra
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Riesch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Neuber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Riesch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-13 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W MALT Oakley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Statsick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT Bradshaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Connors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-07 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W MALT Oakley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lena Oberwetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · WI Adult 65&O 7.0W MALT Riesch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Neuber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W MALT Oakley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Connors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · WI Adult 18&O 3.5W MALT Oakley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
76.4%
55W–17L · 62.2% of games
3.5
17.6%
6W–28L · 34.8% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
53.8%
28W–24L · 53% of games
6.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 46.1% of games
7.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 35.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert