← Search

Jeri Nichols

Draper, UT
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 38W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeri Nichols to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-05-20 · Cottonwood Club-Ricker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · Cottonwood Club-Ricker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-06 · Cottonwood Club-Ricker · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-15 · Cottonwood Club-Ricker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Cottonwood Club-Ricker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-15 · Sports Mall-Lyon/Green · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Fredrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-17 · Sports Mall-Lyon/Green · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-25 · Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Mortensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-09-18 · Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ava Conti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-11 · Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-04 · Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Porsche Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-28 · Sports Mall-Peterson/Locke · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Mortensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.5% of games
3.0
31%
22W–49L · 38.4% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert