← Search

Marilyn Felling

— year-end
185 matches · 104W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marilyn Felling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-05-17 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Golightly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Brent Miller / Brenda Harper
2026-05-08 · Indy X40 8.0 PATC Squires · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Walpole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Golightly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Golightly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Golightly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · Indy X40 8.0 PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Kinsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
Matthew Barr / Amy Vanator
2026-03-06 · Indy X18 8.0 PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Giesler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · Indy A18 4.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Ferrand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
Christopher Layton / Lisa Martin
2026-02-20 · Indy X18 8.0 PATC Squires · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Walpole mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-08 · Indy A18 4.5W PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Koval
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-12-12 · CIN CX 8.5 PATC Squires · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Cooke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · CIN C 7.5W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Chlystun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
4.0
91.3%
21W–2L · 67.7% of games
4.5
45.5%
35W–42L · 49.8% of games
5.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.2% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.5% of games
8.5
72%
18W–7L · 55.8% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.6% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.9% of games
9.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#1 Singles
17%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert