← Search

Michael Diehl

— year-end
40 matches · 26W–14L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Michael Diehl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2024-07-10 · BRTC:Court In Session:Spector · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-03 · BRTC:Court In Session:Spector · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Botch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Michael Schiff
2024-06-26 · BRTC:Court In Session:Spector · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-06-12 · BRTC:Court In Session:Spector · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-05 · BRTC:Court In Session:Spector · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-15 · BRTC:Court In Session:Spector · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-10 · BRTC:Spector's Therapy Group:Spector · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with RICHARD ONEIL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-06-27 · BRTC:Spector's Therapy Group:Spector · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Matt Taylor
2023-06-26 · BRTC:Spector's Therapy Group:Spector · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2023-05-23 · BRTC:Spector's Therapy Group:Spector · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-05-16 · BRTC:Spector's Therapy Group:Spector · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-07-19 · BRTC: Spector's Therapy Group:Spector · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Botch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams6 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 57.3% of games
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 57% of the time
#1 Singles
57%
23 matches
#2 Singles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer