← Search

Amanda Moose

Taylorsville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 32W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Moose to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-05 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-21 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-17 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-10 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Jaclyn Weiss / Jessica Abrams
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · with Carson Helsper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-13 · #3 Doubles · with Gretchen Myers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Tiffany Varela / Lydia Sanders
2025-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gretchen Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 64.1% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 61.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#2 Singles
16%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe