← Search

Charles Lin

Bowling Green, KY
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
21 matches · 14W–7L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Charles Lin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2026-05-03 · KY/BG/LINDSEY-TIPTON · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · KY/BG/MURRAY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · KY/BG/MURRAY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · KY/BG/LINDSEY-TIPTON · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Flener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · KY/BG/LINDSEY-TIPTON · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Flener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-05-22 · KY/BG/YOUNG · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Kickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-2
W
2025-05-19 · KY/BG/YOUNG · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Kickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
W
2025-05-03 · KY/BG/Lindsey/Tipton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Gott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-04-26 · KY/BG/Lindsey/Tipton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Flener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-09-29 · KY\HEN\Team 2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-28 · KY\HEN\Team 2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Noel Canlas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-27 · KY\HEN\Team 2 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 81% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert