← Search

Emily Starita

Chanhassen, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 50W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Starita to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Marx: Tonka JEMM's · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-26 · Mixed Nuts-Borthwick/Eliason · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonas Starita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Nordlie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Dobbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Landrus 40+ S26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · Mixed Nuts-Borthwick/Eliason · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonas Starita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · Landrus 40+ S26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-24 · Mixed Nuts-Borthwick/Eliason · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonas Starita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loryn Follrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60.9%
39W–25L · 56.6% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova