Julie Akers
62 matches · 34W–28L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Julie Akers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history62 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.9% of games
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 23% of games
6.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.1% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 51% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.