← Search

Erika Walther

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 52W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erika Walther to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-08-02 · AYTC-7.0-Busby · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Busby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · Unsupervised · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Stroble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · Unsupervised · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · AYTC-7.0-Busby · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ron Yeh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Unsupervised · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Stroble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanja Omeze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanja Omeze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-26 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Heydt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-05 · AYTC-Busby 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Winfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · AYTC (Daytime) Emminger · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwendolyn Emminger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-01-19 · AYTC (Daytime) Emminger · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwendolyn Emminger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
19W–0L · 65.7% of games
3.5
41%
16W–23L · 47.3% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 63% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer