← Search

Bill McCann

Saint Paul, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 14W–7L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Bill McCann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2026-07-14 · Narvaez · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-07-14 · 65+ 6.0 Acc. Team · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Naistat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
W
2026-07-07 · 65+ 6.0 Acc. Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Narvaez · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
W
2026-07-01 · 65+ 6.0 Acc. Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
W
2026-06-17 · Narvaez · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Trangle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5
W
2026-06-17 · 65+ 6.0 Acc. Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Naistat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
Phillip Scandy / Joan Benedejcic
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · with Laine Weinberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Gloria King / Steven King
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · with Laine Weinberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-24 · Hahler/McCann · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Hahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-09-17 · Hahler/McCann · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Hahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-09-10 · Hahler/McCann · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Hahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 68.3% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert