← Search

James Hosie

ANNAPOLIS, MD
4.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
98 matches · 56W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Hosie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Team Lieber · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with NEERAV GANJOO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Todd Campbell / John Kircher
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Fa-Yueh Hung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Thomas Cyrnak / Christian Williams
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Fa-Yueh Hung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Fa-Yueh Hung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Fa-Yueh Hung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Fa-Yueh Hung championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Jumpei Nakamura championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Team Lieber · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sam Lieber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · Team Lieber · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Doug Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · Team Lieber · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jake Lazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Team Lieber · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Team Lieber · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
79.5%
31W–8L · 59.4% of games
5.0
25%
5W–15L · 41.3% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova