← Search

Graham Wong

Carolina, PR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 105W–134L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Graham Wong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history239 matches
L
2026-09-12 · San Francisco - Liesl · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lidianne Emanuelli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · CTH - Jose Zofakis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yolimar Reano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · San Francisco - Liesl · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lidianne Emanuelli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-09 · CTH - Jose Zofakis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yolimar Reano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · CTH - Danny Rivera · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gustavo Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · CTH - Danny Rivera · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ferdinand Molina-Vergara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · Manati - Meléndez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles DeJesus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · Manati - Meléndez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles DeJesus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · Manati - Meléndez · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roberto Leal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Manati - Meléndez · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlos Rosas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · CTH - Danny Rivera · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ferdinand Molina-Vergara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · Manati - Meléndez · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jaime Florez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.9% of games
4.0
39.5%
34W–52L · 47% of games
8.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
22W–20L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
12W–21L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
57 matches
#1 Singles
8%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer