← Search

Michael Arden

— year-end
57 matches · 40W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Arden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-07-08 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Brindamour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 3-1
W
2026-06-24 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phillip Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-2
W
2025-07-11 · RP: B Larocque/Green · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 5-2
W
2025-06-26 · RP: B Larocque/Green · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-04 · RP: B Larocque/Green · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-07-21 · FC: Travers/Bridges · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas McCaffrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-30 · FC: Travers/Bridges · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-26 · RP: Green/Collins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-18 · RP: Green/Collins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Leso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-06-08 · RP: Green/Collins · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Werchadlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 3-1
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
18W–3L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe