← Search

Dawn Farthing

Madison, MS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 34W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Dawn Farthing to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Miskelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-20 · Otto, Jen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joey Sessums
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Maria Rodriguez / Ellen Warren
2026-08-19 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emi Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Ramsey, Nikki · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellan Clower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · Sessums, Joey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-15 · Do, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-23 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 61.7% of games
4.5
100%
4W–0L · 68.5% of games
8.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 57.2% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams