← Search

Cole Imm

Maumee, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 84W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cole Imm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-07-16 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5M Keating-TWOS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Swick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Halbert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Yavorsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Halbert · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Yavorsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Halbert · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jami Lynn Halbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Halbert · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Yavorsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-4
L
2024-12-15 · NWO Combo 6.5M Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alap Choksey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2024-11-24 · NWO Combo 6.5M Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kenneth Gerber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-11-03 · NWO Combo 6.5M Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alap Choksey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-3
L
2024-10-20 · NWO Combo 6.5M Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alap Choksey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-13 · NWO Combo 6.5M Tusing/Gifford-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alap Choksey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.6% of games
3.0
81.2%
26W–6L · 62.8% of games
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 58.5% of games
6.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 56.8% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 72.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal