← Search

Jake Hugenberg

Parker, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 83W–48L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jake Hugenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-08-23 · WP-G GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Branigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jonathan Jessup
2026-08-20 · WP-G GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · WP-G GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-21 · WP YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erika Wangeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · WP YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marina Sterngold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-24 · WP YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Gunden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · WP-G RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zachary Branigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · WP-G RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · WP BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Shiveley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · WP-G RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Solomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-16 · WP-G RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
David Johnson / Lea VanSchaack
2026-04-12 · WP BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Shiveley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 57.4% of games
4.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 56.9% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.8% of games
6.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 63.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.6% of games
7.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 49.1% of games
8.5mixed
25%
3W–9L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#1 Singles
16%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert