← Search

Caleb Richard

Saco, ME
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 45W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caleb Richard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Apex:NetNinjas:Emmert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Milliken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Apex:Beggs · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Apex:Beggs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Graceffa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · Apex:Richard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Emmert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · Apex:Richard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Milliken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · Apex:Beggs · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Apex:Beggs · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Apex:Beggs · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · Apex:Richard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Milliken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-25 · Apex:Richard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Milliken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · Apex:Richard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Milliken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Apex:Richard · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
55.6%
25W–20L · 53.7% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 68.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova