← Search

Anne Schaefer

Glen Burnie, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 80W–76L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Anne Schaefer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Griffith/Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mala Filippell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Zimet - Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Matney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Henigin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Henigin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · Huntington · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Huntington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Huntington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yulin Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Lady Breakers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Greenlee - Loosely Strung 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · Greenlee - Loosely Strung 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Champion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · Lady Breakers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Corbiere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · Greenlee - Loosely Strung 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · Huntington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
47.2%
42W–47L · 48% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 63.8% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams